Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity
Home
Yale University Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity Yale University Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity
.
.

School Wellness Policies

School Wellness Policies: A Policy Brief

Tools for Evaluating School Wellness Policies

  • WellSAT is an online tool for evaluating the quality of school wellness policies. It is the abbreviated version of the 96-item School Wellness Policy Evaluation Tool described below. Print a hard copy of the WellSAT. View a demonstration of the WellSAT: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. A WellSAT brochure and fact sheet are also available.
    • School Wellness Policy Evaluation Tool This tool can be used to evaluate the school wellness policy of any school district in the United States. It is also known as the Comprehensive Coding System to Measure the Quality of School Wellness Policies.
    • Connecticut School Wellness Policy Coding Tool and Rating Sheet. The Connecticut version of the coding tool was developed by the Rudd Center in partnership with the Connecticut State Department of Education. It was used to evaluate Connecticut school wellness policies.
    • To see coded results for each Connecticut school district, click HERE to access the Connecticut State Department of Education's Web site. Results are listed under the heading "Reports by District". An overview of the study conducted with the State Department of Education is also available.
    • This model wellness policy provides sample language for school districts to use in developing their own local policy.

    Learn More About the Development of Tools for Evaluating School Wellness Policies

    The Connecticut version of the Coding Tool was adapted from the Comprehensive Coding System to Measure the Quality of School Wellness Policies developed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Healthy Eating Research Program. The working group responsible for the coding system includes Marlene Schwartz (Connecticut), Anne Lund and Mollie Greves (Washington), Elaine McDonnell and Claudia Probart (Pennsylvania), and Anne Samuelson and Leslie Lytle (Minnesota).

    In 2006, all school districts participating in the National School Lunch Program were required to develop a written School Wellness Policy according to the 2004 WIC Reauthorization Act. This instrument was designed to be a common and reliable method for abstracting and evaluating school wellness policies within and across states.

    The coding of Connecticut school wellness policies was done at Yale University by Jennifer Falbe, MPH; Kathryn Henderson, PhD; Michael Long; Sarah Novak, PhD; Meghan O’Connell, MPH; Marlene Schwartz, PhD; and Christopher Wharton, PhD.

    Statewide Data Summaries of Connecticut School Wellness Policies

    The Data Summaries provide information on the statewide results of the School Wellness Policy Report for each of the seven policy categories. They include data on the percent of districts with strong, weak and no statements for each policy item and provide average state scores. They also address the impact of District Reference Group and healthy food certification on district scores.

    1. Overview
    2. Nutrition Education
    3. School Meals
    4. Other School Foods and Beverages
    5. Physical Education
    6. Physical Activity
    7. Communication & Prevention
    8. Evaluation

    Do Wellness Policies Work?

    Does a good wellness policy, or any wellness policy, make for a healthier school environment? Researchers at the Rudd Center have set out to test this question. Deputy Director Marlene B. Schwartz, PhD, recently reported at the Healthy Eating Research Conference in Minneapolis, Minn., that preliminary data indicate that school wellness policies led to significant improvements in the nutritional quality of competitive foods sold in Connecticut. In addition, schools that participated in the state-funded Healthy Food Certification Program showed even greater improvement. This suggests that school wellness policies help districts to move in the right direction, but that state-wide programs with financial backing are even more effective in improving school nutrition. Stay tuned for more results.

    History & Definition

    In passing the Child Nutrition and WIC (Women, Infants and Children program) Reauthorization Act of 2004, Congress mandated that all school districts participating in federal school meal programs create and implement school wellness policies by July 2006. These policies must address nutrition education, nutrition standards for foods sold, and physical activity, and must include measures for evaluating the policy’s effectiveness.

    Although the law requires that schools develop, implement and evaluate wellness policies, it does not provide guidelines for creating the policies. In response to local school districts’ requests for guidance, the National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity (NANA), convened more than 50 health, physical activity, nutrition, and education professionals to develop a set of model policies that adhere to federal requirements. These are available online.

    Resources for Assistance in Writing Effective School Wellness Policies:

    • Improving School Food Standards: The Positive Impact on Revenue
    • Text of the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004.
    • Action for Healthy Kids, founded by former Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher, offers a toolkit for writing wellness policies.
    • The School Nutrition Association provides comprehensive information on the implementation dates for the many provisions included in the bill so that the public can clearly track progress over time.
    • Action for Healthy Kids has released a new report on the current state of school wellness policies in America. Asssesing the progress thus far and the hurdles to be surmounted, the report features the result of original field research, and key contributions from voices of authority in children's health, education, and school wellness. It also includes an important essay by former U.S. Surgeon General and Founding Chair of Action for Healthy Kids David Satcher, MD, PhD.